Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Intel’s fight against a more than €1bn fine from the European Commission received support after an adviser to Europe’s top court found fault in the case made by antitrust regulators.
Laila Medina, an advocate-general for the European Court of Justice, said on Wednesday that the commission had erred when calculating the damage to competitors from the US chipmaker’s practice of offering rebates to those buying its computer chips.
Her findings follow an appeal from the commission, the EU’s executive body, over a 2022 decision from the European Court of Justice to quash a €1.06bn fine on Intel as part of a long-running case against the Silicon Valley company about how it offered huge rebates to customers to secure exclusive deals.
She added that the commission’s economic analysis was flawed in calculating the damage under its “as-efficient competitor” test — essentially whether it was offering unfair pricing compared with rivals with comparable costs.
Miranda Cole, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright law firm in Brussels, said the opinion could have implications for the application of the widely used AEC test in the future.
“This case is being closely watched, given its potentially broad impact on pricing practices — rebates and beyond,” Cole said.
“While AG Medina’s opinion today is not the end of this matter, it will add to the ongoing debate about the appropriate test for identifying abusive rebates, and the commission’s discretion to not apply the AEC test,” she added.
The ECJ usually follows the advocate-general’s recommendations, which are non-binding but often end up influencing a final judgment.
The original EU fine dates back to 2009 after the commission concluded that Intel had abused its dominant position by giving hidden rebates to computer manufacturers on condition that they bought all, or almost all, their chips from it.
Intel had also paid manufacturers to halt or delay the launch of products with competitors’ chips and limited their routes to market, a practice known as “naked restrictions”. The court judgment in 2022 upheld this part of the commission’s case and in September Brussels reimposed a fine of €376mn over the practice.
Intel is nevertheless investing heavily in the EU. It has pledged €30bn to boost chip manufacturing there. Along with a giant factory in Germany, attracting about €10bn in subsidies, there are manufacturing and research facilities in France, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Belgium and Spain.
The decade-long investment plan could eventually cost €80bn, subject to demand and the availability of future subsidies.
The commission declined to comment on an ongoing case. Intel has yet to respond to a request to comment.
Read the full article here